COVID-19:’没有人需要死’—Sierra(NZ)
2020年5月4日
Dr.Anthony Fauci,whose"expert"advice to President Trump has resulted in the complete shutdown of the greatest economic engine in world history,has known since 2005 that chloroquine is an effective inhibitor of coronaviruses.
安東尼·福奇(Anthony Fauci)博士向特朗普總統提供的"專家"建議導致世界歷史上最大的經濟引擎完全關閉。自2005年以來，他就知道氯喹是一種有效的冠狀病毒抑制劑。
How did he know this?Because of research done by the National Institutes of Health,of which he is the director.In connection with the SARS outbreak–caused by a coronavirus dubbed SARS-CoV–the NIH researched chloroquine and concluded that it was effective at stopping the SARS coronavirus in its tracks.The COVID-19 bug is likewise a coronavirus,labeled SARS-CoV-2.While not exactly the same virus as SARS-CoV-1,it is genetically related to it,and shares 79%of its genome,as the name SARS-CoV-2 implies.They both use the same host cell receptor,which is what viruses use to gain entry to the cell and infect the victim.
他是怎麼知道的？因為他是國立衛生研究院研究中心的主任，該中心進行了研究。美國國立衛生研究院對由冠狀病毒 SARS 引起的 SARS 疫情進行了研究，得出結論認為這種藥物能有效地阻止 SARS 冠狀病毒的傳播。新型冠狀病毒肺炎同樣是一種冠狀病毒，標記為 SARS-CoV-2。雖然不完全相同的病毒 SARS-CoV-1，它是遺傳相關的，並共享其基因組的79%，因為名稱 SARS-CoV-2意味著。它們都使用相同的宿主細胞受體，病毒就是利用這種受體進入細胞並感染受害者。
The Virology Journal–the official publication of Dr.Fauci's National Institutes of Health–published what is now a blockbuster article on August 22,2005,under the heading–get ready for this–"Chloroquine is a potent inhibitor of SARS coronavirus infection and spread."(Emphasis mine throughout.)Write the researchers,"We report…that chloroquine has strong antiviral effects on SARS-CoV infection of primate cells.These inhibitory effects are observed when the cells are treated with the drug either before or after exposure to the virus,suggesting both prophylactic and therapeutic advantage."
2005年8月22日，美國國家衛生研究院的官方出版物《病毒學雜誌》發表了一篇引起轟動的文章，題為《做好準備——氯喹是SARS冠狀病毒感染和傳播的有效抑制劑》。"（我強調。）研究人員寫道："我們報告……氯喹對靈長類細胞的SARS-CoV感染有很強的抗病毒作用。這些抑製作用是在細胞接觸病毒之前或之後被觀察到的，這表明了預防和治療的優勢。"
This means,of course,that Dr.Fauci(pictured at right)has known for 15 years that chloroquine and it's even milder derivative hydroxychloroquine(HCQ)will not only treat a current case of coronavirus("therapeutic")but prevent future cases("prophylactic").So HCQ functions as both a cure and a vaccine.In other words,it's a wonder drug for coronavirus.Said Dr.Fauci's NIH in 2005,"concentrations of 10μM completely abolished SARS-CoV infection."Fauci's researchers add,"chloroquine can effectively reduce the establishment of infection and spread of SARS-CoV."
當然，這意味著福奇博士（圖右）在15年前就已經知道氯喹及其更溫和的衍生物羥基氯喹(HCQ)不僅可以治療目前的冠狀病毒病例（"治療性"），而且可以預防未來的病例（"預防性"）。因此，HCQ既是一種治療方法，也是一種疫苗。換句話說，它是治療冠狀病毒的特效藥。Dr.Fauci 2005年NIH說:"10μm完全廢除了冠狀病毒的濃度。福奇的研究人員補充說，"氯喹可以有效地減少SARS-CoV的感染和傳播。"
Dr.Didier Raoult,the Anthony Fauci of France,had such spectacular success using HCQ to treat victims of SARS-CoV-2 that he said way back on February 25 that"it's game over"for coronavirus.
安東尼·福奇(Anthony Fauci)博士和法國的迪迪埃·拉烏爾(Didier Raoult)在用 HCQ 治療 sars——cov-2感染者方面取得了如此驚人的成功，以至於他在2月25日表示，對於冠狀病毒來說，"遊戲結束了"。
He and a team of researchers reported that the use of HCQ administered with both azithromycin and zinc cured 79 of 80 patients with only"rare and minor"adverse events."In conclusion,"these researchers write,"we confirm the efficacy of hydroxychloroquine associated with azithromycin in the treatment of COVID-19 and its potential effectiveness in the early impairment of contagiousness."
他和一組研究人員報告說，使用鹽酸氫鈣聯合阿奇霉素和鋅治癒了80名患者中僅有"少見和輕微"不良事件的79名患者。"總之，"這些研究人員寫道，"我們證實了羥氯喹聯合阿奇霉素治療新型冠狀病毒肺炎的療效及其對早期傳染性損害的潛在療效。"
The highly-publicized VA study that purported to show HCQ was ineffective showed nothing of the sort.HCQ wasn't administered until the patients were virtually on their deathbeds when research indicates it should be prescribed as soon as symptoms are apparent.Plus,HCQ was administered without azithromycin and zinc,which form the cocktail that makes it supremely effective.At-risk individuals need to receive the HCQ cocktail at the first sign of symptoms.
高調宣傳的 VA 研究聲稱 HCQ 無效，但事實並非如此。直到病人實際上已經奄奄一息的時候，研究表明一旦症狀明顯，就應該給他們開 HCQ。此外，HCQ 的給藥過程中沒有使用阿奇霉素和鋅，而這兩種物質形成的混合物使其極為有效。高危人群需要在症狀出現的第一時間接受 HCQ 雞尾酒治療。
But Governor Andrew Cuomo banned the use of HCQ in the entire state of New York on March 6,the Democrat governors of Nevada and Michigan soon followed suit,and by March 28 the whole country was under incarceration-in-place fatwas.
但3月6日，紐約州州長安德魯·庫默(Andrew Cuomo)禁止在整個紐約州使用 HCQ，內華達州和密执安州的民主黨州長很快也隨之採取行動，到3月28日，整個國家都遭到了就地監禁的教令。
Nothing happened with regard to the use of HCQ in the U.S.until March 20,when President Trump put his foot down and insisted that the FDA consider authorizing HCQ for off-label use to treat SARS-CoV-2.
直到3月20日，美國總統特朗普放下腳步並堅持要求FDA考慮授權HCQ用於治療SARS-CoV-2的非標籤用途，在美國使用HCQ一直沒有發生。
On March 23,Dr.Vladimir Zelenko reported that he had treated around 500 coronavirus patients with HCQ and had seen an astonishing 100%success rate.That's not the"anecdotal"evidence Dr.Fauci sneers at,but actual results with real patients in clinical settings.
3月23日，Vladimir Zelenko 博士報告說，他已經治療了大約500例 HCQ 冠狀病毒患者，成功率達到了驚人的100%。這不是福奇博士嘲笑的"軼事"證據，而是臨床環境中真實病人的實際結果。
"Since last Thursday,my team has treated approximately 350 patients in Kiryas Joel and another 150 patients in other areas of New York with the above regimen.Of this group and the information provided to me by affiliated medical teams,we have had ZERO deaths,ZERO hospitalizations,and ZERO intubations.In addition,I have not heard of any negative side effects other than approximately 10%of patients with temporary nausea and diarrhea."
"自上週四以來，我的團隊已經用上述方案治療了基里亞斯·喬爾的大約350名患者和紐約其他地區的另外150名患者。在這個小組和附屬醫療團隊提供給我的信息中，我們沒有死亡病例，沒有住院病例，沒有插管病例。此外，除了大約10%的患者出現短暫的噁心和腹瀉外，我沒有聽說過任何副作用。"
Said Dr.Zelenko:
澤蘭科博士說：
"If you scale this nationally,the economy will rebound much quicker.The country will open again.And let me tell you a very important point.This treatment costs about$20.That's very important because you can scale that nationally.If every treatment costs$20,000,that's not so good.
"如果在全國範圍內擴大規模，經濟反彈的速度將快得多。這個國家將再次開放。讓我告訴你們一個非常重要的觀點。這種治療大約需要20美元。這一點非常重要，因為你可以在全國範圍內進行推廣。如果每個治療花費20000美元，那就不妙了。
All I'm doing is repurposing old,available drugs which we know their safety profiles,and using them in a unique combination in an outpatient setting."
我所做的一切就是重新利用那些我們知道其安全性的舊的、可用的藥物，並且在門診病人中以一種獨特的組合方式使用它們。"
The questions are disturbing to a spectacular degree.If Dr.Fauci has known since 2005 of the effectiveness of HCQ,why hasn't it been administered immediately after people show symptoms,as Dr.Zelenko has done?Maybe then nobody would have died and nobody would have been incarcerated in place except the sick,which is who a quarantine is for in the first place.To paraphrase Jesus,it's not the symptom-free who need HCQ but the sick.And they need it at the first sign of symptoms.
這些問題在很大程度上令人不安。如果福奇博士自2005年以來就知道 HCQ 的有效性，為什麼不像澤蘭科博士那樣，在人們出現症狀後立即給藥？也許那樣就沒有人會死，也沒有人會被關在那裡，除了那些病人，那些首先被隔離的人。套用耶穌的話，需要 HCQ 的不是沒有症狀的人，而是病人。他們需要在症狀出現的第一時間服用。
While the regressive health care establishment wants the HCQ cocktail to only be administered late in the course of the infection,from a medical standpoint,this is stupid.Said one doctor,"As a physician,this baffles me.I can't think of a single infectious condition—bacterial,fungal,or viral—where the best medical treatment is to delay the use of an anti-bacterial,anti-fungal,or anti-viral until the infection is far advanced."
雖然退化的醫療保健機構希望 HCQ 雞尾酒只能在感染後期使用，但從醫學的角度來看，這是愚蠢的。一個醫生說："作為一個內科醫生，這讓我很困惑。我想不出任何一種傳染病——細菌、真菌或病毒——最好的醫學治療方法是推遲抗菌、抗真菌或抗病毒藥物的使用，直到感染嚴重為止。"
So why has Dr.Fauci minimized and dismissed HCQ at every turn instead of pushing this thing from jump street?He didn't even launch clinical trials of HCQ until April 9,by which time 33,000 people had died.
那麼，為什麼福西博士在每一個轉折點都最小化和摒棄 HCQ，而不是從龍虎少年街推動這件事呢？他甚至直到4月9日才開始 HCQ 的臨床試驗，那時已有33000人死亡。
This may be why:"Chloroquine,a relatively safe,effective and cheap drug used for treating many human diseases…is effective in inhibiting the infection and spread of SARS CoV."That's the problem.It is safe,inexpensive,and it works–in other words,there's nothing sexy or avant-garde about HCQ.It's been around since 1934.
這可能是為什麼："氯喹，一種用於治療許多人類疾病的相對安全、有效和廉價的藥物......能有效地抑制 SARS 冠狀病毒的感染和擴散。"這就是問題所在。這是安全的，便宜的，而且它的工作-換句話說，沒有任何性感或前衛的 HCQ。大約從1934年開始。
Given human nature,it's possible,even likely,that those who are chasing the unicorn of a coronavirus vaccine are doing so for reasons other than human health.I can't see into anybody's heart,and can't presume to know their motives,but on the other hand,human nature recognizes that there's no glory in pushing HCQ,and nobody is going to get anything named for him in the history books.The polio vaccine was developed by Jonas Salk in 1954,and it is still known as the"Salk vaccine."There will be no"Fauci vaccine"if HCQ is the answer to the problem.
考慮到人類的天性，那些追逐冠狀病毒疫苗獨角獸的人可能不是為了人類健康，而是為了其他原因。我看不透任何人的內心，也不能假定知道他們的動機，但是另一方面，人類的本性認識到推動 HCQ 沒有任何榮耀可言，沒有人會在歷史書中為他命名任何事情。脊髓灰質炎疫苗是喬納斯·索爾克在1954年研製的，現在仍被稱為"索爾克疫苗"如果 HCQ 是這個問題的答案，那麼就不會有"Fauci 疫苗"。
So while Dr.Fauci is tut-tutting and pooh-poohing HCQ,Dr.Raoult and Dr.Zelensky are out there saving lives at$20 a pop.Maybe we should spend more time listening to them than the wizards-of-smart bureaucrats the Talking Snake Media fawns over.
因此，當福西博士發出嘖嘖的噓聲時，拉烏爾博士和澤倫斯基博士卻在外面以每次20美元的價格拯救生命。也許我們應該花更多的時間去傾聽他們，而不是被會說話的蛇媒體奉承的那些精明的官僚。
Dr.Fauci is regarded by the Talking Snake Media as the Oracle at Delphi.The entire nation hangs on his every word.But if nobody is dying and nobody is locked down,his 15 minutes of fame fades to zero.Very few people are not going to be influenced by that prospect,especially when it's easy to keep the attention of the public by continuing to feed the panic.
福西博士被會說話的蛇媒體視為德爾福的神諭。整個國家都在聽取他的每一句話。但是如果沒有人死去，沒有人被關起來，他15分鐘的名聲就會消失殆盡。很少有人不會受到這種前景的影響，尤其是當繼續加劇恐慌很容易吸引公眾注意力的時候。
It should not be overlooked that there is no money in HCQ for Big Pharma since HCQ is a generic that can be manufactured so cheaply there is little profit margin in it.On the other hand,the payday for a vaccine will literally be off-the-charts.Who knows what kind of behind-the-scenes pressure is being put on Fauci and others in the health care establishment?
不容忽視的是，對於大型製藥公司來說，HCQ 是沒有資金的，因為 HCQ 是一種生產成本很低的仿製藥，利潤率很低。另一方面，發放疫苗的日子簡直是天方夜譚。誰知道在醫療保健機構裡，福奇和其他人面臨著怎樣的幕後壓力？
There is a monstrous reputational risk for those who will be found to have dismissively waved off a treatment that could have been used from the very beginning,even back on February 15 when Dr.Fauci said that the risk from Coronavirus was"minuscule."How many lives could have been saved if the heads of our multi-billion dollar health care bureaucracy had been advocating for HCQ treatment from day one?We'll never know.Instead,their advice has been dangerous and deadly in every sense of that word.
對於那些被發現不屑一顧地拒絶接受一種從一開始就可以使用的治療方法的人來說，這是一個巨大的聲譽風險，甚至在2月15日，當時福奇博士表示，來自冠狀病毒的風險"微乎其微"如果我們數十億美元的衛生保健官僚機構的負責人從一開始就倡導 HCQ 治療，又能挽救多少人的生命？我們永遠不會知道。相反，他們的建議在任何意義上都是危險和致命的。
Someday–maybe even today–we will be able to identify the individuals who had the knowledge and expertise to make a global difference,but turned up their noses at the solution when it could have made all the difference in the world.
有朝一日——甚至可能是今天——我們將能夠確定哪些人擁有知識和專業技能，能夠帶來全球性的改變，但卻對本可以帶來全世界改變的解決方案嗤之以鼻。
來源：https://c-vine.com/blog/2020/05/04/fauci-knew-about-hcq-in-2005-nobody-needed-to-die/
轉貼自：https://www.pfcchina.org/qtjl/38855.html
沒有留言:
張貼留言